<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Library Without Walls &#187; Music</title>
	<atom:link href="http://weblog.amillion.us/archives/tag/music/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://weblog.amillion.us</link>
	<description>Digital discussions for a digital age</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 01:25:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Music on TV</title>
		<link>http://weblog.amillion.us/archives/753</link>
		<comments>http://weblog.amillion.us/archives/753#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 22:45:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>AJ Million</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Personal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblog.amillion.us/?p=753</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I should be able to finish my series on Flash late this week &#8211; complete with a discussion of Open Source alternatives &#8211; but for the time being I&#8217;m focused on something more mainstream &#8211; music! Saturday I caught two bands playing on TV: TV On The Radio and The Drive By Truckers. TV On [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-771" style="margin-right: 6px; margin-top: 5px; float: left;" title="drive-by-truckers" src="http://weblog.amillion.us/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/drive-by-truckers.jpg" alt="drive-by-truckers" width="221" height="161" />I should be able to finish my series on Flash late this week &#8211; complete with a discussion of Open Source alternatives &#8211; but for the time being I&#8217;m focused on something more mainstream &#8211; music! Saturday I caught two bands playing on TV: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K0gghjczAt0">TV On The Radio</a> and <a href="http://www.drivebytruckers.com/">The Drive By Truckers</a>. TV On The Radio played on Saturday Night Live and I hadn&#8217;t heard any of their music before. What can I say?! They&#8217;re like some sort of funky hurricane. So funky, in fact, that I&#8217;m having trouble digesting everything that goes on in some of their songs. Either way, seeing them was a friendly reminder of just how much I love finding new music! As for the Drive By Truckers? I happened to catch them play on Austin City Limits and even though I was already familiar with some of their work it was enough to go back and listen through <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decoration_Day_(album)">Decoration Day</a> and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Dirty_South_(album)">The Dirty South</a> again.</p>
<p>Too bad I&#8217;m not musically inclined.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://weblog.amillion.us/archives/753/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Radiohead and the death of MARC cataloging</title>
		<link>http://weblog.amillion.us/archives/470</link>
		<comments>http://weblog.amillion.us/archives/470#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 07:07:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>AJ Million</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cataloging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Material]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WorldCat]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblog.amillion.us/?p=470</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A year and a half ago &#8211; without any librarians seeming to notice &#8211; the MARC cataloging standard officially became obsolete. For years now librarians have noted that MARC is great for describing books but not other media types. The problem lies largely in the fact that MARC and AACR2 are geared to describing single, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A year and a half ago &#8211; without any librarians seeming to notice &#8211; the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MARC">MARC</a> cataloging standard officially became obsolete. For years now librarians have noted that MARC is great for describing books but not other media types. The problem lies largely in the fact that MARC and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AACR3">AACR2</a> are geared to describing single, owned, and <em>published</em> material (i.e. monographs). Moreover, most libraries still focus almost exclusively on <img class="alignright size-full wp-image-482" style="margin-left: 10px; margin-top: 12px; float: right;" title="in_rainbows1" src="http://weblog.amillion.us/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/in_rainbows1.png" alt="in_rainbows1" width="240" height="240" />purchasing books. But the internet, the abundance of multimedia formats, and their meteoric expansion have slowly eaten away at our old-steady reading partner.</p>
<p>It comes as no surprise that there are millions of resources online that are valuable to patrons. The deal is that most libraries don&#8217;t catalog them because: a) they don&#8217;t control their management b) they might go down at any second and c) they aren&#8217;t published. Up until this point these reasons have remained valid. Obviously, if you don&#8217;t own a resource it doesn&#8217;t make sense to treat it like like you paid good money for it. It&#8217;s equally stupid to waste time and energy listing something that isn&#8217;t authoritative or might disappear at the whim of some Cheeto eating webmaster.</p>
<p>Enter Radiohead&#8217;s &#8220;<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_rainbows">In Rainbows</a>.&#8221;</p>
<p>The British rock band released it&#8217;s seventh album straight to the internet via digital download in 2007. Interesting, no? Despite the fact that the band eventually released the album on CD it&#8217;s worth asking a question, &#8220;what if Radiohead had decided to ignore their record company? What if they never sold &#8220;In Rainbows&#8221; on CD-Rom?&#8221; Interestingly enough, <em>to this day</em> OCLC, the largest unified catalog on the planet <a href="http://www.worldcat.org/search?q=in+rainbows&amp;fq=fm%3Amsr&amp;qt=facet_fm%3A_subformat">does not</a> have an obvious MARC cataloging record available. Libraries have taken the cheap way out and cataloged the CD that they bought! Considering that the album received very positive reviews this constitutes a gaping hole in our collective methodologies. It is quite possible that next time libraries are going to be left out. Worse yet, it could mean that our patrons aren&#8217;t going get what they want.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not saying that it will be easy to fix this problem. Providing access to a digital resource requires specific tools and specific technological skills. Fixing or replacing MARC is even more problematic! Nonetheless, librarians don&#8217;t have a much of a choice about what to do. Digital resources aren&#8217;t going anywhere soon and the good old days are gone for sure. An airbag may have saved Thom Yorke&#8217;s life once but he&#8217;s shown that unless libraries get their act together we all may be dead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://weblog.amillion.us/archives/470/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
