Archive for the Category Reference

 
 

Existentalism for Librarians

In a previous post I hinted that working as a solo librarian was making me feel alienated.

After reading a colleague’s post at Library Attack I’m convinced that others feel the same way too. In fact, I’m willing to bet that any librarian who dosen’t work in a traditional environment will likely suffer from some form of existential dread. This probably varies in scope, of course, but there are several reasons to believe we’re a Kierkegaardian bunch.

First, as specified in my post on solo librarianship we don’t have co-workers who share our expertise. We’re the only librarian in the library! Without a group to confide in it’s difficult to vent workplace frustrations, explain complex technical problems to others, or seek professional validation. All of these situations can elicit feelings of detachment.

Second, embedded librarians usually blur the lines between job roles to the point that it can become disorienting. One instance was mentioned in another of my posts that patrons assume “because you can find something on a subject and talk about… then it you’re an authority.” Not true! Plus, embedded librarians can always become more interested in the applied side of things too. If you don’t do library work it’s hard to conceive of yourself as a librarian.

Last, technology is bypassing and shaking up traditional duties. Just because someone takes classes to do one thing they won’t necessarily end out doing it. Refer to my point earlier. If you don’t do library work it’s hard to conceive of yourself as a librarian.

From when we grew up, we were taught that librarians are people who check out books. That they tell us to be quiet and ask us to not bring food or drink into the library. Unfortionately, this conception is blantantly at odds with a number of progressive manefestations within the profession. As a young librarian, I wonder what sort of cracks this might produce? Most imporntantly, if we don’t know “who we are” then how can they know what to do for our patrons?

Embedded Librarianship: An Ugly Thought

Embedded Librarianship has gotten a good rap -  in part – thanks to patrons who opt to use the Internet instead of visiting libraries. This is a good thing, I think, but not many Librarians actually work with their patrons. Not surprisingly, then, the practical problems associated with being embedded don’t seem to be very public.

As an embedded librarian, I can say without hesitation that the most difficult aspect of working directly with patrons is facilitating technical discussions. Working with patrons requires that you know something about the nature of their work. But, it doesn’t require you to know everything. Instead, you operate as a middleman. Interestingly, though, people seem to naturally assume that “if you know about it then you can solve it.”

Therein lies the challenge. Embedded Librarians work so closely with their patrons that a clear distinction between roles can disappear. This can happen on both sides too.

Google Guide

I cleaned out one of my desk drawers today and came across a useful handout for searching with Google. Believe it or not there are numerous operators that can be used to sift through all of the worthless junk out there! For more information check out the Google Guide.

Basic Operations:

   boats ~gloassary - Finds glossaries and dictionaries about
   boats.
   cat dog - Finds the words "cat" and "dog."
   cat -siamese - Finds cat but not siamese.
   "I am batman" - Finds the exact phrase "I am batman."
   fortune-telling - Returns all forms hyphenated or otherwise.
   shoes nike OR adidas - Finds "nike shoes" or "adidas shoes."
   define:skeptic - Defines the word skeptic.

Site Restrictions:

   link: - Find pages that link to another site
   (i.e. link:amillion.us).
   site: - Search only one website
   (i.e. Christmas site:www.census.gov).
   [#]..[#] - Search between numbers. (i.e. Scrubs 2003..2007).

Special Queries:

   book - Search a full-text book
   (i.e. book Great Expectations).
   weather - Find the weather somewhere
   (i.e. weather Columbia MO).
   stocks: - Check your stocks (i.e. stocks: goog).
   phonebook: - Show all listings (i.e. phonebook: MoDOT MO).
   rphonebook: - Show residential numbers 
   (i.e. phonebook: AJ Million).
   info: - Find info on a page (i.e. info:weblog.amillion.us).
   related: - Show all listings
   (i.e. related:weblog.amillion.us).

Many of these aren’t that usefull but it’s always handy to know you can do much, much more than conduct a simple search.

Flash and library instruction, #3

Intro | Part 1 | Part 2 | Part 3

Previously, I’ve tried to give a basic overview of Adobe Flash and to explain how it can be useful to librarians. The outline of my argument is pretty simple: Flash can do more than a Powerpoint presentation, it’s interactive, traditional instructional tools are a little dull, and it can be used to spice things up. Fiesta! The question is am I correct in assuming that this translates into a good fit with libraries? Do libraries have the time to create Flash animations? Do librarians have the skills to make em’? Are enough people looking for instructional support online to justify using a web-based tool? Questions abound!

The answer, I would argue with a number of qualifiers, is “yes.”

As I pointed out earlier Flash has a number of significant advantages to Powerpoint. While Powerpoint is easy to use this turns out to be it’s achilles heel. Powerpoint has a number of straightforward tools that can be used to create slides… but little else. The process is static; it is not dynamic. Flash, on the other hand allows the use of dynamic coding (ActionScript) as well as many more complex tools. So, seeing as dynamic usability is necessary for any program to facilitate interaction, and seeing as interactive instruction tools are generally more enthralling than static ones, Flash is the preferable choice. Programs that you can interact with are usually more effective.

Even so there are a few problems. First, Flash movies take significantly longer to create than normal instructional items. They are more complex. That said, the problem can be overcome by a skilled programmer… but even then not many libraries have one on staff. Libraries need employees who can produce prompt work, so if this can’t be done with Flash, then it becomes useless. Anyone taking the time to peruse out-of-field pay scales should realize that techs aren’t cheap. A dilemma arises: should libraries pony up the money to hire someone with a gamut of technical abilities or not? Can a middle ground be reached? Like with all technical skills knowing how to author Flash animations is a skill that should be mastered before applied. Are library staffs up to this task?

At this point a final question remains. Let’s say a library has overcome all previous mentioned problems. Will it’s patrons still utilize interactive instructional tools? Or will they sit idle? Unfortunately, there isn’t a clear cut answer. In instances where patrons expect access to digital content it makes sense to use Flash for on-line instruction. But, otherwise, more traditional and less tech-savy users might disregard them. Patrons are slowly starting to expect things in electronic format and if this trend continues history is on the side of web-based instructional tools. But we haven’t reached this point yet. Anyone deciding to use Flash should approach it cautiously.

Open Source Workarounds

Last time I checked the cost of Adobe CS4 was around $700.00. The reality of the situation is that many libraries don’t have the money to pay this much. I didn’t have the money to pay that much even with a student discount! Moreover, seeing as most libraries are not-for-profit organizations it makes more sense to support Open Source collaborative projects. Three such ones come to mind that can ease the financial “issue:”

Open Office Impress - http://www.osalt.com/openoffice-impress

Open Office, “features 2D and 3D text rendering, special effects and animation support. The user interface is advanced, but yet simple and easily customizable. Impress imports and exports Powerpoint format files – and it is even able to create flash files (.swf) from your presentation.” This means that for basic slide-like presentations Impress can be used as an alternative.

Open Laszlohttp://www.openlaszlo.org/

Open Laszlo, “is an open source development platform for web applications. It’s main target today is generating Flash files (swf)and AJAX/DHTML for use on web pages and sites. OpenLaszlo is script based with it’s own LZX programming language – and even though it does not provide a WYSISYG interface it a still simple to use and applications are easy to build.” I haven’t had a chance to try Open Laszlo but it seems to be promising.

Flash and library instruction, #2

Intro | Part 1 | Part 2 | Part 3

For this part of my series on Flash and library instruction I am  going to briefly walk through the steps to create a Powerpoint-like Flash movie. The reason I do this is twofold: 1) To show that Flash can be used to create any sort of presentation that traditional software can, and 2) Because the steps necessary to create a game, animated movie, etc… are too complex for most beginners. And that’s primarily who I’m dealing with here. That said, the important thing is to remember that it’s possible to do much more than I demonstrate below.

The example I’ve provided is broken into four steps. Step one involves importing multimedia into Flash for easy access. Step two creates the basic movie timeline structure. Step three creates our visuals, and finally step four adds some basic ActionScript and a button that lets us to move through our movie.

Step #1

Step #1 File

After opening a Flash document you should be staring at a blank document. Really blank. To import all of your multimedia click “File“ » “Import” » “Import to library...” Select the images, video, and other multimedia that you would like to use. Once you do this you should notice that the list to your right becomes populated with the files you imported. For organizational purposes I’ve gone ahead and created a folder to store these files (within Flash), but the entire process isn’t necessary. Next, double-click on the text to “layer1” on the timeline and rename it to “main.” Finally, select the second cell (the one just to the right of the empty circle) and press “F6” until there are seven keyframes. They’ll differentiate your content later on.

Step #2

 Step #2 File

Our next couple of steps are fairly simple. We need to add another layer for our ActionScript and then we need to add some basic code, because it will keep each of our seven frames from playing continuously.  So, click the “insert layer” icon under the timeline and rename it “actions.” Next, add some more keyframes to make our new layer identical to the one underneath it. Once you do this then you can  right click on each of the cells and select “actions.”

Once there all you need to do is add the code that I spoke of earlier. Type in the following and you should be set:

stop();

Simple, eh? This ActionScript lets Flash know that the animation should stop.

Step #3

Step #3 File

This portion is the most intuitive of them all. We have already imported our artwork, added our keyframes, and the bulk of what is left to do is add our content. At the risk of glossing the process over all that needs to be done is for the presentation to be made as you want. This can be done by dragging the appropriate files from the list to your right and adding text. In my case I used the text from Wikipedia’s article on the Dewey Decimal system to save time. Once everything looks the way you want then we are ready for our next and final step. Just remember… all text and content needs to be placed in the appropriate sequential frame.

Step #4

Step #4 File

At this point our movie looks good but it doesn’t “work.”  We need to be able to navigate! Setting this up is a twofold process, and can be a little confusing, but if you bear with me everything will work in no time!

First, create some text in the lower right hand corner and type in “next.” Afterward, right click on the new text and click “convert to symbol” and then select “button.” This will transform our text to a button. When you name the button make sure to add “_btn” at the end as well. Once done you should see an icon  in the library to your right and you’ll know that the new item is created.

What needs done now is to go ahead and right click on the new icon to your right and to select “edit.” In the window that pops up you should see a new timeline that reads “up,” “over,” “down,” and “hit.” Add two keyframes to the over and down cells and then select them to change the text color. The color doesn’t matter, but once it is changed the button should be set to where a transformation occures whenever the user clicks or hovers the button. Nifty! All that’s left to do is to go ahead and drag your new button from the library to each frame.

At this point we have two things to do. First, we need to name each instance of the button. I would suggest going to each frame, selecting the button, and then where it says “instance name” under “properties” name it “next_x_btn.” Change “x” to the appropriate frame number. Make sure each button has a unique name as well. Then, as you did with the previous ActionScript add the following code to each frame. Just take care to update the relative information.

next_1_btn.onRelease = function() {
	gotoAndPlay(2);

};

The “next_1_btn” refers directly to the button that is clicked. Remember when we named them? This is why. The “.onRelease = function()” triggers the event after the button is clicked as well, and the “gotoAndPlay(2)” tells Flash to go to and play the numerical frame provided. After adding all of this  then your new Flash movie should flow seamlessly! If not, don’t worry, because I’ve provided an example below to double-check your work. Here’s the final product!